Stay up to date on the latest news and legislative alerts in mental health law:
For RSS readers
Action Needed to Stem Loss of
Housing
August 22, 2005-Critical housing resources for low-income
people are again at risk as Congress works to cut spending. Protections against
discrimination based on disability are also threatened. Lawmakers need your
support to resist the Bush Administration's efforts to cut funding and roll
back legal protections in current housing programs.
Hold the Line on Housing Funds While Congress is in its summer
recess, Senators and Representatives have been meeting with constituents
about the economy and the soaring cost of housing. Affordable-housing developers,
city officials and disability advocates like you are pressing lawmakers to
respond to the housing crisis for low-income renters.
Congress resumes work
on September 5th and plans to adjourn on the 30th,
not to return until January. The Administration will insist that Congress
enact
its proposals in
September.
As you know, people with mental
disabilities have the least income and the most difficult housing problems.
That is why it has been critical to join with your community's affordable housing
advocates to deliver the following messages:
Fully fund all the housing and
community development programs of the Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD).
Direct HUD to issue fair market
rents that accurately reflect the cost of rental housing in the community
and that restore funding to the rental voucher programs, which disappeared
because
of earlier, inaccurate fair market rent calculations.
Establish a national
Affordable Housing Fund, as many cities have done-funding programs that
have been essential to the construction of affordable rental housing;
Fully fund HUD's Fair Housing
programs to restore lost resources and increase the level of enforcement
against discriminatory barriers to housing.
On August 24th, the Center
on Budget and Policy Priorities released a major analysis of the
House and Senate FY 2006 appropriations bills on voucher funding and federal
housing policy. Visit http://www.cbpp.org/8-24-05hous.htm to
read the report and use its information to convey how the housing crisis
affects the lives of low-income people with disabilities and how the Administration's
proposals will worsen the crisis.
Calls to Senators Needed Now
Senators in the states listed below will vote on these critical
housing issues. If you live in one of these states, please call your Senator
to point out that you will be paying attention to how he or she votes on the
HUD appropriation. Call the Capitol switchboard, 202-224-3121, and ask for
the Senator's office or find the direct number and email form in the roster
of the Senate
Appropriations Committee at congress.org:
Alabama (Shelby)
Alaska (Stevens)
California
(Feinstein)
Colorado (Allard)
Hawaii (Inouye)
Idaho
(Craig)
Illinois (Durbin)
Iowa (Harkin)
Kansas
(Brownback)
Kentucky (McConnell)
Louisiana (Landrieu)
Maryland
(Mikulski)
Mississippi (Cochran)
Missouri (Bond)
Montana
(Burns)
New Mexico (Domenici)
Nevada (Reid)
New
Hampshire (Gregg)
North Dakota (Dorgan)
Ohio
(DeWine)
Pennsylvania (Specter)
South Dakota
(Johnson)
Texas (Hutchison)
Utah (Bennett)
Washington
(Murray)
West Virginia (Byrd)
Wisconsin (Kohl)
Vermont
(Leahy)
HUD Proposal to End Fair Housing Program Flies in the
Face of Evidence Irony abounds. At the same time that HUD is proposing to
slash its Fair Housing budget and eliminate its Fair Housing First Program,
a HUD-funded study published on July 25th shows that people with
mental and physical disabilities were subjected to more incidents of housing
discrimination than families with children, people of color and all of the
other groups protected by fair housing laws. Discrimination Against
Persons With Disabilities - Barriers at Every Step is available from
HUD by calling 1-800-HUD-USER, or by download from http://www.HUDUSER.org.
The study found that people with a variety of physical and
mental disabilities were discouraged by rental agents from pursuing their rental
inquiries, were denied requests for accommodations and modifications in their
housing, and were refused service when they used telephone relay systems to
communicate with housing providers and their agents.
In addition to conducting the study, the Urban Institute
prepared testing guidance for HUD. The Guidance
for Practitioners is available in PDF format via the same phone number
and website. With the Guidance, it is possible to conduct tests of local housing
and to pursue findings of discrimination with education and enforcement actions.
Comment Period Reopened on HUD Section 504 Evaluation Section 504 of
the Rehabilitation Act is the only federal civil rights law that requires agencies
that either give or get federal funds
to assess whether their programs, activities and policies pose barriers to
participation by people with disabilities. On July 22, HUD published a Federal
Register notice requesting public comments on its own self-evaluation.
HUD may be only the second federal agency to conduct such
a self-evaluation. (The Department of Justice was the first). HUD's evaluation
identified structural and communication barriers in its headquarters and field
offices. Unfortunately, HUD did not review its publications, regulations, policies
or procedures to determine how they might be impeding enforcement of Section
504.
The Bazelon Center worked with the Consortium of Citizens
with Disabilities and the National Network of Disability Rights to submit comments
to HUD. Our first comment was to ask for a longer comment period, which HUD
approved. The comment period is now open and may remain so, since HUD has not
published a second notice with new closing date.
The HUD docket is open to comments about difficulties anyone
has experienced in working with HUD because of physical or mental disabilities.
The more examples HUD receives, the clearer the message will be that it must
conduct its business in a non-discriminatory way, and that any barriers to
non-discrimination must be identified and eliminated.
For more information, the sources mentioned in this bulletin
are: