The Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law
|
![]()
|
With the midterm elections just weeks away and mandatory appropriations bills and other pressing legislative business at an impasse, the politics of 11th-hour legislative negotiations could strand important mental health initiatives until after the elections. Lawmakers have already shelved some important issues for people with disabilities. The 1996 law authorizing the Temporary Assistance for Families (TANF) program was set to expire at the end of September, but Congress extended the law until December 31. Members of Congress now have additional time to hammer out differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill that would reauthorize TANF. Since a substantial number of the program's beneficiaries are affected by a mental or physical impairment, TANF reauthorization is of crucial importance to people with disabilities. Adults who receive TANF benefits were three times more likely than adults not receiving benefits under the program to have at least one physical or mental health impairment, according to a study released last year by the General Accounting Office (GAO). TANF recipients with impairments were only half as likely to leave the welfare rolls as those without impairments and when they did they were less likely to be employed, according to the GAO. In fact, 36 percent of recipients with impairments had no income source when they left the rolls. Disability advocates fear that the new work rules in the House bill may exacerbate this trend and have pushed for provisions to help states provide supports and services - such as mental health and substance abuse counseling and job training - that families need to move toward greater self-sufficiency. The extension has done little to clarify the bill's future. Lawmakers are considering a wide array of policy options, from delaying the rewrite of the law until the next Congress to simply extending the current law for one to three years. By postponing action on other important initiatives, the continuing resolution may give lawmakers political cover for decisions that might otherwise become election year issues for voters concerned with mental health policy. But with elections out of the way, lawmakers could be less responsive to constituent concerns. Action on most spending bills - including the Labor Health and Human Services appropriations bill that funds important mental health programs through the Department of Health and Human Services' Center for Mental Health Services - will most likely be delayed until after the elections. Other issues may suffer as well. House Energy and Commerce Chairman Billy Tauzin (R-LA), formerly a supporter of the Family Opportunity Act's provisions to increase access to mental health services to children through expanded Medicaid eligibility, appears to be considering alternatives to the bill's Medicaid provisions. The bill has bipartisan support in Congress and is endorsed by mental health and family advocates across the country. Such a dramatic change could stall passage indefinitely. At the moment, political assessments on any bill's future are speculative. But the uncertain political climate after the elections will almost certainly have important implications for mental health policy. Take actionLawmakers need to hear from you! Here's how to make sure your voice gets heard...
NewsbytesSenators Introduce Criminal Justice BillSeveral senators last week introduced a bill to address issues raised by the growing number of children and adults with severe mental health conditions who are ending up in correctional facilities. Senators Mike DeWine (R-OH), Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Sam Brownback (R-KS), Charles Grassley (R-IA) and Maria Cantwell (D-WA) introduced S. 3147 - "The Mentally Ill Offender Treatment and Crime Reduction Act of 2002" - to foster local collaborations between the criminal justice and mental health systems. The Bazelon Center has withheld endorsement of the bill, concerned that the legislation neglects pre-booking diversion strategies, which many experts believe to be and most effective intervention for people with mental illnesses in the criminal justice system. The DeWine legislation does not include re-entry programs to help people with mental illnesses transition from the criminal justice system to life in the community. Nor does the bill's narrow focus on treatment acknowledge the critical need for stable housing, job-related services and other supports in the community. The Bazelon Center plans to work with the next Congress on legislation to deal with the criminal justice issue in a more holistic manner.
|
|||||||||||||
| Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law 1101 15th Street, NW, Suite 1212 Washington, DC 20005 Phone: 202-467-5730 Fax: 202-223-0409 Email: webmaster@bazelon.org |
| Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law 1101 15th Street, NW, Suite 1212 Washington, DC 20005 Phone: 202-467-5730 Fax: 202-223-0409 Email: webmaster@bazelon.org |