The Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law


 

 

For Immediate Release:
Monday, July 1, 2002

 

Contact: Lee Carty
at 202-467-5730 x 121 or leec@bazelon.org

Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law
Calls on States to Protect Consumer Rights

Medicaid Budgets Should Not be Balanced Through "Backdoor" Limits on Access to
Mental Health Services or Prescription Drugs

States must not be allowed, in the name or cause of balancing their budgets, to restrict access to medications or services that consumers want and need. Controlling costs may be an important objective for a state or public agency, but it must be balanced by legal protections for covered individuals so that consumers have appropriate choices and are not denied medication or services in order to limit public outlays.

Recently, states have begun to impose various restrictions on Medicaid phar-macy programs. Those restrictions masquerade as simple administrative procedures, but they are in fact so burdensome and time-consuming for consumers, doctors and pharmacists that they reduce access and undermine quality of care. For example, states increasingly create preferred drug lists and require prior authorization for non-listed drugs. Prior authorization is a sensible approach for drugs with questionable efficacy, but when decisions to exclude medications are based on economic rather than clinical factors, the prior authorization process becomes a barrier to appropriate services. People with “serious” mental illness commonly are prescribed medications for extended periods. Impeding access to the medications these individuals prefer—often newer generation drugs with fewer side effects and greater efficacy—creates delays in services, reduces the likelihood that the individual will remain in treatment and can have significant long-term implications for quality of life.

On June 28, PhRMA filed suit to prevent Michigan from implementing prior authorization restrictions on pharmaceuticals based on economic factors. We agree with PhRMA that states’ actions to limit access to medications not for clinical reasons, but as a strategy to leverage cost reductions in their Medicaid pharmacy programs may ultimately achieve no real savings and, more impor-tant, create significant risks for individuals with mental disabilities.

Medicaid pharmacy programs should not subjugate their therapeutic objectives to cost-cutting determinations that do not serve consumers and that deliver bottom-line savings more imagined than real.

-30-

The Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law is the leading national legal-advocacy organization representing people with mental illness or mental retardation. Through precedent-setting litigation and in the public-policy arena, the center works to define and uphold the rights of adults and children who rely on public services and ensure them equal access to health and mental health care, education, housing and employment. The nonprofit organization is supported primarily by private foundations and individuals.

a
  Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law
1101 15th Street, NW, Suite 1212
Washington, DC 20005

Phone: 202-467-5730
Fax: 202-223-0409
Email: webmaster@bazelon.org

 
Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law
1101 15th Street, NW, Suite 1212
Washington, DC 20005

Phone: 202-467-5730
Fax: 202-223-0409
Email: webmaster@bazelon.org