Fair Housing Information Sheet # 2:
Structural Modifications In Public And Section 8 Housing
The ADA and structural modifications in public and
Section 8 housing
A housing authority is a public entity under Title II of the
ADA, and thus its services, activities and benefits must be accessible to
individuals with disabilities. Whether and to what extent a housing authority
must make its dwelling units accessible under the ADA depends on whether
the dwellings are considered new construction, previously constructed but
undergoing alterations, or previously constructed but not undergoing any
alterations.
In the case of new construction or alterations on previously
constructed dwellings begun after January 26, 1992, the dwelling units and
common areas must be accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities.
Compliance with either the ADAAG or UFAS standards is acceptable (UFAS contains
specific requirements for residential dwelling units; ADAAG does not). A
housing authority may choose which standard to use, but it must be consistent
and apply only one standard to an entire building.
Existing facilities must meet the program accessibility requirement,
which means that, viewed as a whole, these facilities must be accessible
to and usable by persons with disabilities, although not all buildings or
dwelling units must be accessible. The housing authority may achieve program
access by such methods as transfers to alternate units, assignment of aides
or redesign of equipment. Structural changes are not required unless there
is no other way to provide services. 28 C.F.R. § 35.151. Even when structural
modifications are required, they may be made on a limited basis, such as
one building or meeting room.
Landlords who accept Section 8 payments are not public entities
subject to Title II. The housing authority's administration of its Section
8 program, however, must meet the program access requirement of Title II.
Section 504 and structural modifications in public
and Section 8 housing
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794,
is applicable when housing is built or rented with the use of federal funds.
Therefore, both public housing and Section 8 housing are covered under the
HUD regulations implementing Section 504, 24 C.F.R. Part 8. A housing authority
that administers a Section 8 program is a covered entity, although a private
landlord that accepts tenants through the Section 8 program is not. 24 C.F.R. § 8.3
(definition of recipient).
Under the HUD regulations implementing Section 504, new multi-family
housing (five or more dwelling units) designed or constructed after July
11, 1988 must be readily accessible to and usable to individuals with disabilities.
This standard is met if a minimum of 5 percent of the total dwelling units,
but not fewer than one unit, is accessible for individuals with mobility
impairments. An additional 2 percent of the total units, but not fewer than
one unit, must be accessible for persons with hearing or vision impairments.
24 C.F.R. § 8.22(b). It is possible for HUD to prescribe a higher number
of accessible units if requested and upon demonstration of need. 24 C.F.R. § 8.22
If substantial alterations are made to a project that has
more than 15 units, these same rules apply. A "substantial" alteration is
one that costs more than 75 percent of the cost of replacing the entire facility.
24 C.F.R. § 8.23. Lesser alterations must be made accessible to the maximum
extent feasible. If changes to single elements within a dwelling unit, when
taken together, constitute an alteration to the unit, the entire unit must
be made accessible. Once 5 percent of the units are accessible for individuals
with mobility impairments, there is no further requirement unless HUD prescribes
a higher number. 24 C.F.R. § 8.23.
Structural changes are not required in existing facilities
where other means exist for making the program or services accessible to
individuals with disabilities. 24 C.F.R. § 8.24. As under Title II, moving
a person to an available accessible unit is a viable alternative. A covered
entity, however, is not required to make any changes that would fundamentally
alter the nature of the program or result in undue administrative or financial
burden. The cost of structural changes must be borne by the covered entity.
The Fair Housing Act and structural modifications
to public and Section 8 housing
Under the FHA, new multi-family (four or more units) housing
designed and constructed for first occupancy after March 13, 1991 must be
built in accordance with the Fair Housing Accessibility Guidelines. 24 C.F.R. § 100.205;
24 C.F.R. Appx. II, IA (Fair Housing Accessibility Guidelines). There is
no requirement, however, that alterations be made in an accessible manner.
In addition, if structural modifications are required to a pre-March 1991
dwelling unit or to common areas to make them accessible, such modifications
must be paid for by the person with a disability. 24 C.F.R. § 100.23.
Some Other Questions
What does "accessible" mean?
An "accessible" dwelling unit is one that is located on a
continuous, unobstructed path that connects accessible spaces and that can
be approached, entered and used by a person with disabilities. 24 C.F.R. § 8.3
(definitions). In addition, depending on when the unit was constructed or
altered, the unit may also have to meet the UFAS, ADAAG, or FHA standards.
Is it permissible for all of the accessible
units to be located in one area?
Accessible dwelling units, to the maximum extent feasible,
are to be distributed throughout projects and sites. These units are also
supposed to be in a sufficient range of sizes and amenities so that a qualified
individual with a disability has a choice that is, as a whole, comparable
to that of person without a disability eligible for housing assistance in
the same program. 24 C.F.R. § 8.26.
Who has priority on a waiting list to
move into an accessible unit?
When an accessible unit becomes vacant, an owner or manager
must offer the unit in the following order of priority:
- to an occupant of the same project, or comparable projects under common
control, who is a person with a disability and not currently
in an accessible unit;
- to an eligible applicant on the waiting list having a disability requiring
the accessibility features of the vacant unit; and
- to an eligible applicant who does not have a disability. In this case,
the owner may require the applicant to agree to move to a non-accessible
unit when one becomes available. 24 C.F.R. § 8.27(b).
There are three preferences that also apply to all individuals
seeking public housing regardless of whether they have disabilities. 42 U.S.C. § 1437(d)(1)(A)
and 24 C.F.R. § 880.613(c). These preferences are applied in the following
order:
- Persons occupying substandard housing, homeless shelters, or who are
homeless.
- Persons paying more than 50% of their income for rent.
- Persons who are involuntarily displaced at the time they are seeking
assistance.
A person with a disability without one of the preferences must
still be given priority over a person without a disability with a preference. Liddy
v. Cisneros, 823 F. Supp. 164 (S.D.N.Y. 1993).
What about "reasonable accommodations"?
Title II of the ADA, § 504, and the Fair Housing Act all require
that reasonable accommodations be made to rules, policies, practices or services,
where necessary to allow a person with a disability the opportunity to use
and enjoy a dwelling. Note, however, that under the FHA structural changes
are covered by the "reasonable modifications" provision, not the reasonable
accommodation provision. See 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(A). Determining
what is reasonable requires an individualized analysis and will vary from
case to case, although the statutes are clear that anything that imposes
an undue financial or administrative burden or constitutes a fundamental
alteration is not required. Examples of modifications that would likely be
found reasonable are the addition of a small ramp needed to enter a dwelling
unit, installing grab bars, substituting lever door handles or designating
a parking space in a first come-first serve parking lot. Adding an elevator
to an existing facility or bypassing the waiting list of either a new or
altered facility would most likely be found unreasonable. See, e.g., Liddy
v. Cisneros, 823 F. Supp. 164 (S.D.N.Y. 1993).
What happens after the 5%/2% requirement is met?
The HUD regulations explicitly state that when a new project
has reached the 5%/2% accessibility level or an altered project has 5% of
its units accessible, then no more units are required to be accessible. 24
C.F.R. § 8.23. However, the regulations also state that a higher percentage
of accessible units may be prescribed by HUD upon request and a demonstration
of need. 24 C.F.R. § 8.22. Data that would be effective in showing need is
something like census data or a currently effective Housing Assistance Plan.
24 C.F.R. § 8.23(b)(2). In addition, a Housing Authority that is administering
Section 8 housing has an obligation to do at least three other things to
help those seeking an accessible dwelling unit:
- Provide a list of accessible Section 8 units in the area;
- Provide assistance in locating accessible housing; and
- Request an exception to the fair market rent if necessary to make an
accessible unit available.
24 C.F.R. § 8.28.
Are there permissible alternatives to
making a unit accessible?
Keep in mind that both Title II and Section 504
require that a "program access" requirement be met, and thus regulations
state that an acceptable alternative to making structural modifications in
an existing facility is moving a person to an available accessible unit at
another site or making alterations on a selective basis. In addition, while
tenant meetings and other similar events must be held in an accessible space,
not all existing spaces must be made accessible. 24 C.F.R. §§ 8.23(b), 8.24(b).
August 1998
This information sheet was produced under a
contract with the Advocacy Training/Technical Assistance Center of the National
Association of Protection & Advocacy Systems
For more information, contact the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, 1101 15th Street, N.W., Suite 1212
Washington, D.C. 20005-5002. E-mail: mallen@relmanlaw.com.
|