Notes
1. This law was first enacted in 1975 as Public Law 94-142,
and was later renamed the Individuals with Disabilities Act, 20 U.S.C.
§1401(a).
2. Raver, C. Cybele, (2002). Emotions Matter: Making
the Case for the Role of Young Childrens Emotional Development for
Early School Readiness. A Social Policy Report from the Society for Research
in Child Development. Available at: www.srcd.org/spr.html
3. Forness, Steven R., & Kavale, Kenneth A. (2001).
Reflections on the future of prevention. Preventing School Failure: Heldref
Publications, Winter 2001, 75-81.
4. Presidents Commission on Excellence in Special
Education, (July 1, 2002). A New Era: Revitalizing Special Education for
Children and Their Families. 22.
5. Weist, Mark, D., Axelrod Lowie, Jennifer, Flaherty,
Lois and Pruitt, David, (2001). Collaboration among education, mental
health and public health systems to promote youth mental health. Psychiatric
Services. 52:10, 1348-1351.
6. Garfinkle, L. (1977, Spring). Youth with disabilities
in the justice system: Integrating disability specific approaches. Focal
Point 11 (1), 21-23; and SRI International (1991). Youth with Disabilities:
How Are they Doing? The First Comprehensive Report from the National Longitudinal
Transition Study of Special Education Students. CA:Menlo Park.
7. Leone, P.E., & Meisel, S. (1997). Improving education
services for students in detention and confinement facilities. Childrens
Legal Rights Journal, 71 (1), 2-12.
8. Woodruff, Darren, Osher, David, Hoffman, Catherine,
et al, Promising Practices in Childrens Mental Health, Volume III:
the Role of Education in a System of Care: Effectively Serving Children
with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders (1998 Series). U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, Child, Adolescent and
Family Branch, Rockville, MD.
9. Presidents Commission (2002).
10. Mental Health, Schools and Families Working Together
for All Children and Youth: Toward A Shared Agenda, A Concept Paper (2002).
National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors and the
Policymaker Partnership for Implementing IDEA at the National association
of State Directors of Special Education.
11. Weist et al. (2001).
12. When referring to identification under the IDEA,
the federal term emotional disturbance will be used. When
referring more generally to children significant need for mental health
services, the term mental and emotional disorders will be used. This term
emphasizes the existence of a diagnosable disorder using mental health
criteria.
13. Coutinho, M., & Denny, K. (1996). National leadership
for children and youth with serious emotional disturbance: Progress and
prospects. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 207-227.
14. Kauffman, J.M. (2001). Characteristics of emotional
and behavioral disorders (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Mental
Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, National Institutes
of Health, National Institute of Mental Health, 1999.
16. Various terms are used to describe these children
in federal and state education regulations and in mental health rules.
The federal law and definition refer to children who have emotional
disturbance. Some states refer to children with behavioral
disorders. For this report, the term mental and emotional disorders
is used. This emphasizes the presence of a health disorder in these children,
but is broad enough to include all such disorders.
17. U.S. Department of Education, Twenty-Third Annual
Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (2001). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
18. Increasing it by only 0.3 percent, bringing the
national average of children with emotional disturbance to no more than
1.04 percent.
19. Forness, Steven, & Knitzer, Jane, A New Proposed
Definition and Terminology to Replace Serious Emotional Disturbance
in Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, School Psychology Review,
21:1, 1992. Pp 12-20; and Kidder-Ashley, Pamela, Deni, James R., Azar,
Kelly R. & Anderton, Jessica B., How 41 education agencies identify
students with emotional problems. Education.1999.119:4, 598-609.
20. Katsiyannis, A., Landrum, T., Bullock, L., &
Vinton, L. (1997). Certification requirements for teachers of students
with emotional or behavioral disorders: A national survey. Behavioral
Disorders, 22, 131-140; Forness, Steven R. (1992) Legalism versus professionalism
in diagnosing SED in the public schools. School Psychology Review, 21:1,
29-34; and Forness, S. R., Kavale, K.A., & Lopez, M. (1993). Conduct
disorders in the schools: Special education eligibility and comorbidity.
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 1, 101-108.
21. Kidder-Ashley et al. (1999); Forness & Knitzer
(1992); Forness & Kavale (2001); and Coutinho & Denny (1996).
22. Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders (1990).
Position Paper on Provision of Service to Children with Conduct Disorders.
Behavioral Disorders, 15, 180-189; Nelson, C.M., Rutherford, R.B., Center,
D.B. & Walker, H.M. (1991). Do public schools have an obligation to
serve troubled children and youth? Exceptional Children, 57, 406-415;
Mattison, R.E., Morales, J., & Bauer, M.A. (1992). Distinguishing
characteristics of elementary schoolboys recommended for ED placement.
Behavioral Disorders, 17, 107-114; Forness et al. (1993); Maag, J.W.,
& Howell, K.W. (1992). Special education and the exclusion of youth
with social maladjustments: A cultural organizational perspective. Remedial
and Special Education, 13, 47-54; Forness, S.R. (1992). Broadening the
cultural-organizational perspective in exclusion of youth with social
maladjustment: First invited reaction to the Maag and Howell paper. Remedial
and Special Education, 13, 55-59; Nelson, C.M., & Rutherford, R.B.
(1990). Troubled youth in the public schools: Emotionally disturbed or
socially maladjusted? In P.E. Leone (Ed.), Understanding Troubled and
Troubling Youth: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 38-60. Newbury Park,
CA: Sage; and Nelson, C. Michael, (1992) Searching for meaning in the
behavior of antisocial pupils, public school educators and lawmakers.
School Psychology Review, 21:1, 35-39.
23. Cohen, M.K. (1994). Children on the Boundary: The
Challenge Posed by Children with Conduct Disorders. Alexandria, VA: National
Association of State Directors of Special Education; Forness & Knitzer
(1992); pp 12-20; Maag & Howell (1992); and Nelson (1992).
24. Kauffman, J.M. (1999). How we prevent the prevention
of emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 65, 448-468.;
and Forness & Kavale (2001).
25. Forness & Kavale (2001); and Nelson (1992).
26. Forness & Kavale (2001).
27. Forness & Kavale (2001).
28. Fewer than half of children with emotional disturbance
in special education are mainstreamed following identification, (Forness
& Knitzer,1992) and two thirds of all special education students in
the most restrictive settings are those with emotional disturbance. Skiba,
R., & Grizzle, K., (1991). The social maladjustment exclusion: Issues
of definition and assessment. School Psychology Review, 20, 577-595; and
Forness, Steven R. (1992). Legalism versus professionalism in diagnosing
SED in the public schools. School Psychology Review, 21:1, 29-34.)
29. Forness & Kavale (2001) and Forness, S. R.,
& Kavale, K.A. (2000). Emotional or behavioral disorders. Background
and current status of the EBD terminology and definition. Behavioral Disorders,
25, 205-210.
30. Oswald, Donald, Coutinho, Martha and Best, Al M.,
Community and school predictors of over-representation of minority children
in special education. Paper presented at Harvard University Civil Rights
Project Conference on Minority Issues in Special Education, Cambridge,
Massachusetts. November 17, 2000. Available at www.gse.harvard.edu/news/features/soeced03022001.html.
31. Parrish, Tom, Disparities in the identification,
funding and provision of special education. Paper presented at Harvard
University Civil Rights Project Conference on Minority Issues in Special
Education, Cambridge, Massachusetts. November 17, 2000. Available at www.gse.harvard.edu/news/features/soeced03022001.html.
32. Oswald, Coutinho and Best (2000) and Presidents
Commission (2002).
33. Kidder-Ashley et al. (1999) and Nelson, Michael
C. & Pearson, Cheryll A. (1991), Integrating Services for Children
and Youth with Emotional Behavioral Disorders. Council for Exceptional
Children. Reston, Virginia.
34. Forness & Knitzer (1992).
35. Forness (1992).
36. Forness & Knitzer (1992).
37. Forness & Knitzer (1992) and Forness & Kavale
(2001).
38. Kidder-Ashley, et al. (1999); Forness (1992); Nelson
& Pearson (1991); Forness & Knitzer (1992).
39. Forness & Knitzer (1992).
40. Costenbader, Virginia & Buntaine, Roberta (1999).
Diagnostic discrimination between social maladjustment and emotional disturbance:
An Empirical study. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders; Austin;
Spring 1999, 2; and Claizio, H. (1992). Social maladjustment and emotional
disturbance: problems and positions II. Psychology in the Schools, 29,
331-241.
41. Costenbader & Buntaine (1999); Skiba & Grizzie
(1991); and Slenkovitch, J.E.; Forness (1992); and Nelson et al. (1991).
42. Costenbader & Buntaine (1999); Forness, S.R.,
Kavale, K.A., & Lopez, M. (1993). Conduct disorders in the schools:
Special education eligibility and comorbidity. Journal of Emotional and
Behavioral Disorders 1, 101-108; and Skiba & Grizzle (1991).
43. Forness & Knitzer (1992) and Forness (1992).
44. Kidder-Ashley, et al. (1999); Forness (1992); and
Forness & Knitzer (1992); Skiba & Grizzle (1991); and Nelson (1992).
45. Costenbader & Buntaine (1999).
46. Costenbader & Buntaine (1999); Nelson et al.
(1991); Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders (1990). Position
paper on provision of service to children with conduct disorders. Behavioral
Disorders, 15, 180-189; and Forness (1992).
47. Nelson & Pearson (1992).
48. Forness & Kavale (2000).
49. Costenbader & Buntaine Roberta (1999); Forness
(1992); and Skiba & Grizzle (1991).
50. See generally Harvard University Civil Rights Project
Conference on Minority Issues in Special Education, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
November 17, 2000. Available at www.gse.harvard.edu/news/features/soeced03022001.html.
51. Forness & Kavale (2001).
52. Nelson & Pearson (1992).
53. Kidder-Ashley et al. (1999).
54. Kidder-Ashley et al. (1999); Knoff, H.M. (1995).
Best practices in personality assessment. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes
(Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology-II , 849-864. Washington,
DC: National Association of School Psychologists; and Wright, D., Pillard,
E.D., & Cleven, C.A. (1990). The influence of state definitions of
behavior disorders on the number of children served under P.L. 94-142.
Remedial and Special Education, II, 17-22.
55. Kidder-Ashley et al. (1999) and Knoff (1995).
56. The District of Columbia was excluded from this
analysis.
57. U.S. Department of Education, Twenty-Third Annual
Report to Congress (2001).
58. Florida, Iowa, Minnesota, Georgia and Wisconsin.
|