Medicaid Services for Adults
Federal Medicaid law gives states several important options for covering community
services for people with mental illness. These are:
- rehabilitation services optioncovers a wide array of individualized
community services;
- targeted case managementcan be specifically targeted to individuals
with a serious mental illness, and can be even more specifically targeted
to individuals with a serious mental illness who are also being discharged
from an institution or who are in a group at high risk of unnecessary institutionalization
(as defined by the state);
- assertive case management, including outreach and 24-hour-a-day access
to community services; and
- group homes of fewer than 16 beds (covers services but not room and board,
which must be offset through other means, such as SSI benefits).
Rehabilitation Services
Nearly all states already cover psychiatric rehabilitation services under
the Medicaid option for "other diagnostic, screening, preventive and rehabilitative
services (Section 1905(a)(13) of the Social Security Act). However, according
to the latest (1998) data, 11 states have not elected to cover such
services.(5) The following states could secure
additional resources to comply with L.C. by adding psychiatric rehabilitation
to their state Medicaid system:
|
Connecticut
Georgia
Idaho
|
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Montana
|
Nevada
New Jersey
Utah
|
States that do provide the psychiatric rehabilitation services option often
do not have the services available statewide or have a restricted definition
of covered activities. All states should re-examine their Medicaid psychiatric
rehabilitation option, since these services are key to successful community
living for people with serious mental illnesses.
Targeted Case Management Services
Targeted case management is one of the most flexible options in Medicaid.
It can be targeted to a specific population and does not have to be offered
statewide. Federal law explicitly states that such services can be targeted
to individuals who are "chronically mentally ill." Twenty-four states do not target
intensive case management services toward adults with mental illnesses.(6) These
states are:
|
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
|
Idaho
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Massachusetts
Nebraska
|
Nevada
New Mexico
Oregon
South Carolina
Tennessee
Utah
Washington
|
These states could better meet their obligations under L.C. by providing
targeted case management services.
Assertive Case Management
And Assertive Community Treatment
Intensive case management and its variations, such as assertive community
treatment (ACT), are important services for individuals with serious mental
illnesses, particularly in their transition from institutional placements.(7) Intensive
case management is a term encompassing a range of programs, and at its best
exemplifies good community care based on person-centered planning and the individual's
full participation.
On June 7, 1999, Sally Richardson, Director of Medicaid Services for the federal
Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), issued a letter to state Medicaid
Directors informing them that assertive community treatment and assertive case
management "can be supported under existing Medicaid policies and a number
of states currently include ACT services as a component of their mental health
service packages." The letter further emphasizes that "consumer participation
in program design and the development of operational policies is especially
key in the successful implementation of ACT programs."(8)
In support of these programs, HCFA took note of the evidence of the effectiveness
of assertive case management and assertive community treatment in reducing
inpatient care among high-risk individuals, making these programs particularly
relevant to the population effected by L.C. Several studies support
improvements in clinical and social outcomes as a result of intensive case
management programs; these studies suggest that both assertive community treatment
and assertive case management are superior to conventional case management
for high-risk cases.(9)
The 33 states that have been identified as providing ACT programs at this
time are shown in the table below. Other states should
review their Medicaid rules to ensure that intensive case management services
are covered.
States with ACT Programs
as of October 1999
|
State
|
Number of Programs
|
State
|
Number of Programs
|
State
|
Number of Programs
|
Alabama
|
4
|
Maryland
|
14
|
Rhode Island
|
6
|
Alaska
|
2
|
Massachusetts
|
2
|
South Carolina
|
6
|
Arizona
|
5
|
Michigan
|
86
|
South Dakota
|
2
|
Arkansas
|
1
|
Minnesota
|
1
|
Tennessee
|
4
|
California
|
3
|
Missouri
|
8
|
Texas
|
1
|
Connecticut
|
6
|
Montana
|
3
|
Vermont
|
9
|
Delaware
|
11
|
New Hampshire
|
10
|
Virginia
|
3
|
Florida
|
4
|
North Dakota
|
6
|
West Virginia
|
0
|
Idaho
|
6
|
Ohio
|
5
|
Wisconsin
|
67
|
Illinois
|
7
|
Oklahoma
|
1
|
Wyoming
|
3
|
Indiana
|
7
|
Oregon
|
1
|
District of Columbia
|
1
|
Kentucky
|
1
|
Pennsylvania
|
3
|
|
|
Group Homes
Many of the individuals covered under L.C. have been confined in
institutions for years. A number have quite serious disorders that may require
the services and supports of a community group home. While the majority of
people with mental illness can live in independent housing with appropriate
services and supports, some will require 24-hour-a-day programming in small
community residences.
Although Medicaid law specifically excludes from coverage services in psychiatric
institutions for adults ages 22-64, group homes are not covered by this "Institutions
for Mental Diseases" (IMD) rule. As IMDs, state mental hospitals, private psychiatric
hospitals and nursing homes that serve a disproportionate number of individuals
with mental illnesses are not eligible for Medicaid reimbursement for services
to adults. However, at the state's option, adults over age 64 may be covered
in such facilities, and children under age 22 have access to psychiatric hospital
services.
Facilities of 16 or fewer beds, such as group homes, are not considered IMDs
under Medicaid law. Accordingly, while group homes are not a separately defined
Medicaid service and states may not claim reimbursement for the cost of room
and board, they may bill Medicaid for necessary group home staff and for other
mental health services provided to group home residents.(10)
States can increase their resources for community services, avoiding unnecessary
institutionalization, if they make these policy changes to secure Medicaid
funding for services in group homes.
Coverage Of Newer Medications
An important part of the treatment for a mental illness is access to the newer "atypical" medications
for psychiatric disorders. These drugs have significantly fewer and less severe
side effects; they are also more effective than older antipsychotics.
On February 12, 1998, Sally Richardson sent a letter to state Medicaid directors
regarding the advantages of using newer medications for persons with schizophrenia
on Medicaid. In June 7, 1999, she pointed out that this directive applies equally
when states contract for services under Medicaid, such as with managed care
entities.
In the February 12 letter, HCFA informed states that they must respond within
24 hours to prescription requests for the newer atypical antipsychotic medications.
The letter also said that states must have procedures to ensure that in emergencies
at least a 72-hour supply of the requested medication is made available.
In addition to being in violation of the Medicaid statute, a state that fails
to provide adequate access to the atypical medications in compliance with these
federal Medicaid rules will have weakened its defense under the ADA that it
is unable to provide necessary services for all individuals who are or are
at risk of unnecessary institutionalization.
Nursing Home Placements
Under the Nursing Home Reform Act,(11) states
are required to screen individuals being considered for nursing home placement
to ensure that they need that level of intensive nursing care. Individuals
who do not need such a level of care should be diverted into appropriate community
placements. In many states, there are individuals residing in nursing homes
who may be eligible for community care.
L.C. applies to Medicaid-financed nursing facilities just as it does
to state hospitals, and states must ensure that individuals unnecessarily institutionalized
in these facilities (or those at risk of such unnecessary institutionalization)
are included in their planning for L.C. compliance.
|