The Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law


 

 

An Act to Reduce Recidivism by Improving Access to Benefits for Individuals with Psychiatric Disabilities upon Release from Incarceration

Commentary on Article VI

Even when the state adopts all of the policies and processes set forth in Articles III-V to facilitate and expedite access to benefits, some inmates may nevertheless end up released and in the community without benefits. This might result from their being released earlier than expected because of the progress of their legal cases, or from processing delays by SSA, errors in identifying potentially eligible inmates and completing applications, or other unanticipated circumstances.

This article creates bridge programs to keep such individuals from falling through the cracks. The bridge programs are available to released inmates who have applied for federal benefits but whose applications are still pending. Released inmates qualify for the bridge programs if their applications for federal benefits were filed during incarceration or within three months of their release. The bridge programs provide temporary health care coverage and income benefits during the period that federal benefit applications are pending. Without bridge programs, many released inmates will lack access to health care coverage and income support and be at risk of decomposition and re-offending.1

VI. B. Temporary Medicaid
Regardless whether the inmate has ever before been a Medicaid recipient, states have the flexibility under federal law to place potentially eligible individuals in their Medicaid program, pending full review of eligibility. Initially, the cost of Medicaid services must be borne by the state, but once an individual’s Medicaid eligibility is confirmed, the state may seek reimbursement from the federal government for services rendered before the eligibility determination.2 Reimbursement will be made in accord with the state’s match arrangement.3
Allowing for quick access imposes some financial risk on the state because some individuals enrolled in the temporary Medicaid program may ultimately be found ineligible for Medicaid. However, the state incurs a greater risk from the recidivism that often results when released inmates do not have access to appropriate mental health services.4

VI. C. Temporary Income Support
Many inmates with psychiatric disorders depend on SSI or SSDI to secure stable housing. Without stable housing, released inmates are at risk of decomposition and re-offending. As the Council of State Governments Consensus Project notes, “[a]dequate housing is the linchpin of successful reentry for offenders with mental illness.”5

When SSI or SSDI cash benefits are not immediately available, temporary income support should be provided to assist released inmates in securing housing and other necessities.
Temporary income support may be provided by putting individuals on state General Assistance in states that have such a program, or through a new program. The model law directs that payments be equal to the basic SSI payment in the state. A less costly, but considerably less effective, alterative would be to make payments equal to the General Assistance rate.

To the extent permitted by federal law, states may recoup support payments made to released inmates from SSI and SSDI back benefits. Under the model law, to be eligible for the temporary income support program, an individual must have applied for SSI or SSDI. Once the individual’s eligibility for SSI or SSDI is established, the individual will receive back benefits for the time following release during which the individual’s SSI or SSDI application was pending.

The state may arrange with recipients of temporary income payments to be reimbursed from any SSI and SSDI back benefits the recipient receives.6

Notes

1. See Nelson, M., Deess, P., and Allen, C. The First Month Out, Post-Incarceration Experiences in New York City (New York, New York: Vera Institute of Justice, 1999).

2. 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(34), 42 C.F.R. § 435.914.

3. In all states, the federal government pays at least 50% of the cost of the Medicaid program. The actual proportion of costs paid by the federal government depends on the economic well-being of the state’s population: the poorer the state, the higher the proportion of costs paid by the federal government. In the poorest states, the federal government pays approximately 75% of the cost of Medicaid services. POMS SI 01715.001 B (“The Federal government pays 50 percent of Medicaid administrative costs and between 50 and 83 percent of program costs following a statutory cost-sharing formula.”) “POMS” refers to the Social Security Administration’s Program Operations Manual System, available online at SSA’s website, http://policy.ssa.gov/poms.nsf.

4. See discussion of costs in the commentaries on Articles I and X.

5. Council of State Governments, Criminal Justice/Mental Health Consensus Project (June 2002) at p. 167. Also, “housing is crucial for helping individuals with mental illness maintain stability and avoid involvement in the criminal justice system.” Id. at p. 110.

6. We are unaware of any federal law that would bar such an arrangement. See Washington State Dept. of Social and Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of Keffeler, — U.S. —, 123 S.Ct. 1017 (2003) (state may recoup foster care expenditures from children’s SSI and SSDI benefits).

 

a
  Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law
1101 15th Street, NW, Suite 1212
Washington, DC 20005

Phone: 202-467-5730
Fax: 202-223-0409
Email: webmaster@bazelon.org

 
Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law
1101 15th Street, NW, Suite 1212
Washington, DC 20005

Phone: 202-467-5730
Fax: 202-223-0409
Email: webmaster@bazelon.org