Appendix: Focus Group Methodology
Recruiting families on Medicaid who are willing to participate in a two-hour
focus group is difficult. These families often face financial hardships
and many lack transportation. Accordingly, a targeted recruitment strategy
was selected as the best approach to locate families with children on
Medicaid with a serious mental and emotional disorder. Focus group participants
were recruited through Families Together in New York State and the Oregon
Family Support Network (OFSN), state chapters of the Federation of Families
for Childrens Mental Health. Families receiving assistance from
the federations chapters have children with serious disorders, and
we believed that recruiting families who have developed positive relationships
with Federation chapters would increased the likelihood that they would
commit their time to participate in the study. The invitation to participate
did not ask whether the families were satisfied with the services their
child(ren) had received.
In addition to Medicaid eligibility, the study required that the family
include children with a serious mental and emotional disorder who had
received mental health services via Medicaid in the past year. Because
many of these families had received support and assistance in accessing
the mental health services from the Federation chapters, they represented
the best-case scenario: parents who are informed about their childs
disorder, the services they needed, and on how to maneuver through the
system.
We used various approaches to recruit parents, including announcements
in newsletters and distribution of flyers to programs serving children
with serious emotional disturbances, such as support groups, child mental
resource centers and county departments of mental health. Families were
screened to ensure that their children were Medicaid-eligible and that
they had a diagnosis of serious mental disorder. No random selection was
involved. All eligible families were invited to participate.
The focus group topic guide was developed by the Bazelon Center with
input from Families Together, OFSN and the Bazelon Centers Institutional
Review Board (IRB). The topic guide included questions on the following
areas: 1) identification and diagnosis of childs mental disorder;
2) knowledge of mental health services covered under the states
Medicaid plan; 3) access to listed mental health services; 5) amount of
services received; 4) satisfaction with services received; and 6) suggestions
for improving the system. A short survey asked about the participants
relationship to the child and the childs age, diagnoses and mental
services received in the past year. The survey, topic guide, consent form
and research protocol were reviewed and approved by the Bazelon Centers
IRB in January 2002.
Parents completed the survey and then participated in the focus group
for approximately two hours. As is standard focus group policy, participants
were paid for their time. Child care was also made available. Each of
the focus group discussions was transcribed.
Focus group participants in New York discussed their experience with
40 children and those in Oregon discussed experience with 46 children.
Most participants in all groups were mothers. Children were primarily
male and tended to be older (ages 7-18) with multiple mental health problems.
Diagnoses most often reported were:
- attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder or attention deficit disorder;
- depression;
- learning disorder;
- conduct disorder;
- oppositional disorder/oppositional defiant disorder;
- post traumatic stress syndrome.
We compared the minority representation of our focus groups with the
two states demographic data about children in their Medicaid programs.
New York reports that African-American and Hispanic children account for
56 percent of children on Medicaid receiving services at state-licensed
facilities.12 Our focus group was closely aligned,
reflecting 59 percent African-American or Latino members. In Oregons
Medicaid program, African-American or Latino children account for 28 percent
of enrolled children; our focus group, having little Latino representation,
included only 9 percent.13
|